iAudiophile.net Forums
Go Back   iAudiophile.net Forums > Hard Disk Players > iAudio X5

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2005, 07:13   #1
millenium man
www.cowon-iaudio.de.vu
 
millenium man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 110
Wich File-Format???

Hi

Here's my question: I'm going to transfer my music to my Cowon X5... But in wich Format?!

Am I going to hear any difference between for example Mp3 and wma?!

PS:I have the Shure E2c ( if this should be important somehow )

And wich Format do YOU have (and if you want to let us know why :thumbsup: ) , you have can choice from: FLAC, OGG, WMA, MP3 ASF, WAV & MPEG4

THX!!!!
millenium man is offline View millenium man's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 07:19   #2
m_memmory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derby, Britain
Posts: 259
Send a message via MSN to m_memmory
Default

Basically use whatever format you want to use. Many people use MP3's because they can be used on pretty much every single DAP out there (as well as mobile phones etc) Others will use WMA as the files will generally be smaller for the same sounding quality but then your stuck with files that can only be used on WMA playing DAPs.

Personally I use ogg vorbis. I picked this because I just wanted something that would sound good on my X5 and be small enough to be able to fit lots on. I don't use any other player other then the X5 and my PC so it doesn't matter to me that they can only be played on ogg vorbis playing hardware.

Soon I intend to get a large enough hard drive that I can rip my entire music collection to it in FLAC and then I can just encode from that to whatever lossless format I might ever want to in the future.
m_memmory is offline View m_memmory's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 10:00   #3
Diego
Member
 
Diego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canton, GA, USA
Posts: 161
Send a message via Yahoo to Diego
Default

But dont songs in ogg format eat up the the battery of a dap? I know they're smaller but i'm pretty sure i hear that they take up a lot of energy or something. For me, mine are mostly (95%) mp3 128kbps. I started using wma but then stoppped cause my of my brothers owns an ipoo and wma's cant be on there. Ogg sounds like a good format except for the battery, right now my X5 is only getting out 10hrs tops so i'm staying with mp3. 128kbps is a good bitrate, any higher sounds better but takes up more space, and a lower bitrate makes your songs have low quality sound. Personally i like all of my collection to be in one format, which is mp3, and thats what most people have and what all DAPs/mp3 players play(after all, they are named after it) so I prefer mp3.

Last edited by Diego; 12-19-2005 at 10:05..
Diego is offline View Diego's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 10:21   #4
m_memmory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derby, Britain
Posts: 259
Send a message via MSN to m_memmory
Default

ogg does take a bit more computer power to decode...

but then to have the same sound out of an ogg file as the similar bit-rate mp3 file the ogg file would be smaller meaning that it wouldn't be as complicated to extract the audio so it kinda works out to be about the same (well I've never noticed much of a difference)

To me I'd rather have the smaller file sizes meaning I can put more music on my X5 (or use it for my uni assignments to make sure I've got a back up of all my work - some of those files are massive!)
m_memmory is offline View m_memmory's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 15:03   #5
millenium man
www.cowon-iaudio.de.vu
 
millenium man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 110
Default

Ok ...nice replys! thx..

But all my music is in Mp3 ,the sound-quality won't improve if i convert it in formats with a higher bitrate , will it?!
millenium man is offline View millenium man's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 15:08   #6
Pete7874
X5 killa
 
Pete7874's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 738
Default

No, it won't.
__________________
X5 20GB + Shure E2C
Pete7874 is offline View Pete7874's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 16:01   #7
HiMDforMe
Rockbox5
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 995
Default

yeah, don't waste your time trying to re-encode mp3s. if you're not too particular i say just use mp3 and then you know you'll never had any issue with compatibility on players or if you want an mp3 disc or something. plus the better battery life. use the preset-alt-standard setting and rip away. its all about the music anyway, so whatever you use keep the quality fairly high as least for archiving purposes.
HiMDforMe is offline View HiMDforMe's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 16:58   #8
atm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Default

What I like about oggs is that they are open-source codecs. No strings attached, no DRM, or anything like that.
atm is offline View atm's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 11:58   #9
millenium man
www.cowon-iaudio.de.vu
 
millenium man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 110
Default

ok...

I was just afraid , because everyone says with the e2c's you haer EVERYTHING
and that they play how the output is , that they don't cange anything ...well , and if I have a bad quality I thought i would maybe hear the bad things with the E2c's even more than with some cheap earphones.... waht do you mean?

sry for all these newbie questions but , well I AM A NEWBIE :bigsmile:
millenium man is offline View millenium man's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 14:08   #10
m_memmory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derby, Britain
Posts: 259
Send a message via MSN to m_memmory
Default

The e2c's are good IEMs and you will hear lots of stuff in the music - whether you are more likely to be able to tell whether the music is ripped as bad quality all depends on how good you are at listening and picking out the sounds.

I have my music in Q4 OGG (works out about 45-50Mb per CD) and I can't tell any difference between that and 320kbps MP3 from some ABX testing I did (where you test 2 sound files to see if you can pick out which is which but the computer picks the files randomly so you don't know which one your hearing and so the placebo effect is taken away of thinking the higher quality sounds better because you know that your hearing it)
m_memmory is offline View m_memmory's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 16:48   #11
Lucifer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 220
Default

Hmmmm. You use whatever sounds best to you. I use a mixture of level 0 FLAC, MP3 at different bitrates, (for example I have my rap/hip hop encoded at 160kb mp3), 48 KHz WAV, and wma at different bitrates.
Lucifer is offline View Lucifer's Photo Album   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Copyright © 2006-2011 CrowdGather |  About iAudiophile |  Advertisers | Investors | Legal | Contact